Is The Occult Evil?

Photo of author

By All Knowing

 

Is The Occult Evil?

Why do so many relate to the occult as being evil? Even the mention of the word  occult carries a preconceived notion many regard as evil.

oc·cult  /əˈkəlt/

Noun

Supernatural, mystical, or magical beliefs, practices, or phenomena.

 

Adjective

Of, involving, or relating to supernatural, mystical, or magical powers or phenomena.

 

Verb

Cut off from view by interposing something.

 

Synonyms

adjective.  

secret – hidden – mysterious – cryptic – mystic – privy

 

verb.  

eclipse – cover – obscure – hide – screen – conceal

Are people afraid of the connotation of  the occult because so many are afraid of what is hidden or… is it  because of lack of comprehension of what they read?  I think the study of the unknown, is something worthy of reflection, even if it temporary in duration.  What might be the psychology of the matter?

The following is written by Paul Cooijams

http://www.paulcooijmans.com

The attraction of the occult –

Occultism, often dormant, has had a number of revivals over the centuries, the latest being the present New Age wave. Even though hard science rejects most of it, and skeptics reject virtually all of it, people remain attracted. This suggests it satisfies certain human needs that are not met in mainstream society and religion. The following core ideas, here in general terms, appear to be responsible for this attraction:

  1. The world as we know it is bad and unreal; hidden behind it is a good and real world, that we may get to know after we die, or by doing certain exercises and studies, and that contains knowledge of all there is, was and will be;
  2. Individual growth is possible through a succession of grades, in areas unknown in regular society, and this is one's true task or goal in life;
  3. The individual must be seen as a whole and not reduced to its material parts.

Most forms of the occult have elaborated on at least one of these ideas. A closer look at each follows.

The world is bad –

The vital question is: Why and how did people get this idea?

Occult theory tends to be generated by a class of individuals who could be characterized as: Thinkers, philosophers, theoretical scientists, mystics, hermits. In other words, highly intelligent, introverted, not at ease in the regular social world (extraverted occultists exist too but are more inclined toward the practical side, like ritual magic; they design the rituals rather than thinking up the theory).

Such people – the occult theorists thus characterized – share the experience that almost all others are less intelligent, sincere, conscientious and moral than they are. Therefore, they indeed live in a bad world by their own standards. They have good reason to hope and wish a better world is possible. This is the origin of the central idea of the occult: The world we live in is bad, and a good and real one is hidden somewhere.

The precise contents of most occult theory is incorrect and not relevant here. The general method for generating and spreading occult theory is as follows:

You make up something that is inconsistent with the known laws of nature. You know it is not true because you are the one who made it up. You know that if you tell it to others and mention you made it up they too will know it is not true. So you give it credibility by claiming it was passed on to you by a higher authority, like God, the Devil, angels, the White Masters, the astral light, the spirit of a deceased whose dead is surrounded by mystery, et cetera. Perhaps at some point you start believing it yourself; perhaps you were even hallucinating to begin with and have believed it from the start on. In no case is it true. But if you play your cards right, your followers will keep believing it for centuries.

So, while the original idea is attractive, the usual occult elaborations do not satisfy those of us who think clearly and rationally because we see they are made up, not real, false. They only work for the suggestible and uncritical. It is tempting to think of a new interpretation that would satisfy those who demand truth and realness instead of mere "feelgood" stuff, but that lies outside the scope of this article.

Individual growth –

The type of person described above – the occult theorist – will often find that regular society does not offer appropriate ways to develop his talents and satisfy his need for growth and insight, and note that others of lesser ability receive more recognition than they deserve. This frustration is the origin of the systems for individual growth offered by occult organizations. If desire for growth is not met in mainstream society, it will find other ways, just like the water of a blocked river will seek an alternative path to the sea.

These systems generally aim to bring the student closer to the hidden real world, and reward advancement by awarding grades in a succession of levels, whereby the highest grades are, of course, only attained and held by those who do not reside in the world known to us any more. The contents of such systems can broadly be divided like this:

  • Theoretical courses in the various branches of esoteric knowledge: gnosticism, hermetism, astrology, numerology, and very many more;
  • Practical courses in ritual magic, astral travel, healing, meditation and so on;
  • Forms of psychotherapy.

Again, the actual contents will disappoint the rational skeptical thinker nowadays, and only make the suggestible and uncritical feel good. Still the attraction remains, and actually increases in our days as science is more and more discovering that important human faculties have a biological basis and are largely fixed throughout adult life. This shutting off of ever more areas of potential self-improvement – intelligence, personality… it is dawning to ever more people we can't change those in ourselves, except for the worse – promotes the search for ways of individual growth that are possible and real.

The individual must be seen as a whole –

This is the most recent of the occult ideas, because it is, as it were, the shadow cast by modern medical science. Originally there was no distinction between scientific and alternative medicine, as medicine on the whole was primitive. After micro-organisms were discovered as a cause of illness, the pharmaceutical industry and scientific medicine developed, dividing the world of healing into scientific and alternative branches.

The scientific branch is reductionist, rational and materialistic, analyzing the patient into its chemical, physical, observable, measurable parts. It focuses on the parts that are relevant with regard to the illness, and does not waste time by looking at the rest of the patient. From the occult viewpoint, these material parts belong to the unreal bad world and are therefore irrelevant. Alternative healing avoids scientific reductionism and calls itself "wholistic" in contrast.

The line between scientific and alternative healing is still being drawn as we speak. Much of the earlier twentieth century psychology and psychiatry bordered on the occult, and is now being pushed into the realm of the alternative by hard-line skeptics (for instance, the psycho-analytical schools). This unmasking of parts of the "soft" sciences as pseudo-science will likely go on over the next decades.

Still, people keep going to alternative healers because the wholistic approach makes them feel better, even knowing their methods are less effective than the scientific ones. The wholistic approach is attractive even in the absence of measurable effect on illness. Clearly, many go to a doctor, alternative or not, out of a need for attention rather than being physically ill. The unlucky ones who do have a serious illness and only go alternative end up dying unpleasantly. So in a sense alternative medicine does work; it is a fatal cure for stupidity!

Conclusion –

The occult derives its attraction from a few central ideas that remain relevant to the present day and will likely gain power as science advances. The elaborations on these ideas proposed over the centuries are unsatisfactory as they are fictitious, not true, lacking critical inquiry. An interpretation that is real, correct, in accordance with the laws of nature and thus truly satisfying the corresponding human needs, is still due.

 

 

3 thoughts on “Is The Occult Evil?”

  1. this author

    is terribly prejudiced in his opinions lol, i notice that ALL options are nonsense with the sole exception of his own of course, and he seems to feel comfortable hiding behind the idea of modern day rational thinkers….i also think his definitions of the term occult arent quite inclusive of the full range of meanings that word has had throughout history…the duaslistic concept of good and bad isn't nearly so hard to identify, and both conditions certainly do exist….i like to identify each by comparing any given thing to love or power…one gives and the other takes, and this can be identified in ALL ways of people, regardless of culture, religion, type, or any other categorization of a particular path….what is your particular point of view on the issue, as you see it?

  2. I agree with …

    … most of what you have presented. I would however feel the same if an occultist wrote up his or her views in the same manner that this author has presented his views. 

  3. Ditto

    I simply have to agree with the responses. I mainly go by my own experiences and responses to them. Logic does not always apply.

Comments are closed.